All case studies
Public TransitMobileData QualityCost SavingsGIS

TriMet Tablet-Based Rider Survey

Replaced a paper-based on-board Origin-Destination survey with a tablet program built on Open Data Kit — ~30% cost savings, 92% reduction in survey-to-insight lead time, near-zero throw-out rate.

TriMetJanuary 2018

The challenge

Paper-based on-board O-D surveys took 6+ months to produce usable data, had ~20% throw-out rates from un-geocodable handwritten addresses, and were expensive to print, mail, key, and geocode.

The solution

Pioneered a tablet-based on-board survey program using Open Data Kit (ODK) plus an in-house Android mapping app, staffed with college-student surveyors and managed centrally in IT-GIS — with real-time dashboards for QA, sampling, and shift management.

Results

~30% cost savings overall vs. paper-based survey
92% reduction in lead time from data collection to usable results
60–65% response rate (vs. <20% for paper)
Near-zero data throw-out rate (vs. ~20% for paper)
60–66% reduction in surveyor labor cost ($17/hr college students vs. $60/hr vendor)
Eliminated ~$105K in printing, data entry, and geocoding costs for ~30,000 surveys

Tech & data

Open Data Kit (ODK)AndroidGISReal-time DashboardsTrelloGoogle Workspace

Role note: This work was led by Baofeng Dong while at TriMet (pre-LMAi Labs), and was presented to the TRB AP050 committee in January 2018. It is included here because it illustrates the kind of innovation-tech program LMAi Labs now helps small and mid-sized transit agencies ship.

The Challenge

Public transit agencies are required to run on-board surveys for Title VI, FTA reporting, and service planning. TriMet's traditional paper-based on-board Origin-Destination (O-D) survey had a number of compounding problems:

  • Slow. It typically took more than six months between data collection and usable, geocoded results — long after the data was useful for planning.
  • Lossy. Roughly 20% of records had to be thrown out because handwritten addresses couldn't be geocoded.
  • Expensive. A typical survey cycle of ~30,000 questionnaires meant ~$12,500 in printing and mailing, ~$63,000 in data entry, ~$30,000 in geocoding (for 51,337 addresses in one cycle), and ~$60/hour for vendor surveyors.
  • Low response. Paper response rates were typically under 20%.

The agency needed a better way to capture rider O-D data — without the cost, the throw-out, or the six-month wait.

Our Approach

We pioneered a tablet-based on-board survey program built on Open Data Kit (ODK) for form design and data aggregation, integrated with an in-house Android mapping app for capturing on/off stop information. The whole program was managed centrally in IT-GIS by a dedicated Electronic Survey Developer & Analyst, with field supervisors and 25–30 college-student surveyors.

The first tablet-based on-board survey ran in 2014–15 as a pilot O-D study. The savings were significant enough that it became a dedicated program — and all of TriMet's on-board surveys are now conducted with tablets.

Two survey methods

  • Short survey: Surveyors scan QR codes at front and back doors with tablets to identify boarding/alighting ridership patterns and set sampling goals for the long survey.
  • Long survey: Tablets with pre-populated answers capture detailed ridership behavior — origin and destination geography, transfer rates, mode of access, and demographic information — with built-in skip logic and validation.

Key Features

Data quality, by design

  • Built-in skip logic so respondents only see questions that apply to them.
  • Automatic validation of values against constraints and integrity rules at entry time.
  • Multi-language support by changing language settings on the device.
  • Geocoded origin and destination coordinates captured directly, eliminating the address-to-geocode loss.

Real-time program management

  • Real-time web dashboard streaming with map visualization.
  • Real-time QA/QC and analytics on incoming responses.
  • Real-time sampling-quota management by route, time of day, and segment.
  • Real-time progress reporting and shift management for the surveyor team.

Hiring approach

College students at $17/hour replaced consultant surveyors at $60/hour — over two-thirds less in labor cost — while providing bilingual coverage, local-area knowledge of the transit system, and a recurring talent pipeline for adjacent customer-service projects.

Results

  • ~30% cost savings vs. the paper-based survey overall.
  • 92% reduction in lead time from data collection to usable results.
  • 60–65% response rate with tablets, compared to under 20% with paper.
  • Near-zero throw-out rate — paper surveys typically lost ~20% of records due to un-geocodable addresses.
  • Eliminated ~$105K in printing, data entry, and geocoding costs for a ~30,000-survey cycle.
  • The program scaled: tablet surveys are now the default for every on-board survey at TriMet, and tablets are reused for facilities inventory, on-street customer service, and other field work.

Why It Matters For Small/Mid Transit Agencies

Most small and mid-sized agencies are still stuck with the paper-survey model — or paying a vendor a premium for a black-box tablet program. The TriMet program shows that the right combination of open-source tooling, in-house GIS, and tight program management can give an agency a survey instrument it owns, runs, and can adapt to the next study without starting from scratch. That same playbook — break the vendor lock-in, own the data, ship the dashboards — is what LMAi Labs brings to AI-powered service planning and Title VI equity analysis for transit agencies today.

Run your first scenario this afternoon

Create a free workspace, upload your GTFS, and see your network costed in the browser. No setup call, no credit card. You are in your own workspace the same afternoon.