All Projects
Public TransitMobileData QualityCost SavingsGIS

TriMet Tablet-Based Rider Survey

Replaced a paper-based on-board Origin-Destination survey with a tablet program built on Open Data Kit — ~30% cost savings, 92% reduction in survey-to-insight lead time, near-zero throw-out rate.

TriMet
January 2018

The Challenge

Paper-based on-board O-D surveys took 6+ months to produce usable data, had ~20% throw-out rates from un-geocodable handwritten addresses, and were expensive to print, mail, key, and geocode.

Our Solution

Pioneered a tablet-based on-board survey program using Open Data Kit (ODK) plus an in-house Android mapping app, staffed with college-student surveyors and managed centrally in IT-GIS — with real-time dashboards for QA, sampling, and shift management.

Results

~30% cost savings overall vs. paper-based survey

92% reduction in lead time from data collection to usable results

60–65% response rate (vs. <20% for paper)

Near-zero data throw-out rate (vs. ~20% for paper)

60–66% reduction in surveyor labor cost ($17/hr college students vs. $60/hr vendor)

Eliminated ~$105K in printing, data entry, and geocoding costs for ~30,000 surveys

Tech Stack

Open Data Kit (ODK)AndroidGISReal-time DashboardsTrelloGoogle Workspace

Role note: This work was led by Baofeng Dong while at TriMet (pre-LMAi Labs), and was presented to the TRB AP050 committee in January 2018. It is included here because it illustrates the kind of innovation-tech program LMAi Labs now helps small and mid-sized transit agencies ship.

The Challenge

Public transit agencies are required to run on-board surveys for Title VI, FTA reporting, and service planning. TriMet's traditional paper-based on-board Origin-Destination (O-D) survey had a number of compounding problems:

  • Slow. It typically took more than six months between data collection and usable, geocoded results — long after the data was useful for planning.
  • Lossy. Roughly 20% of records had to be thrown out because handwritten addresses couldn't be geocoded.
  • Expensive. A typical survey cycle of ~30,000 questionnaires meant ~$12,500 in printing and mailing, ~$63,000 in data entry, ~$30,000 in geocoding (for 51,337 addresses in one cycle), and ~$60/hour for vendor surveyors.
  • Low response. Paper response rates were typically under 20%.

The agency needed a better way to capture rider O-D data — without the cost, the throw-out, or the six-month wait.

Our Approach

We pioneered a tablet-based on-board survey program built on Open Data Kit (ODK) for form design and data aggregation, integrated with an in-house Android mapping app for capturing on/off stop information. The whole program was managed centrally in IT-GIS by a dedicated Electronic Survey Developer & Analyst, with field supervisors and 25–30 college-student surveyors.

The first tablet-based on-board survey ran in 2014–15 as a pilot O-D study. The savings were significant enough that it became a dedicated program — and all of TriMet's on-board surveys are now conducted with tablets.

Two survey methods

  • Short survey: Surveyors scan QR codes at front and back doors with tablets to identify boarding/alighting ridership patterns and set sampling goals for the long survey.
  • Long survey: Tablets with pre-populated answers capture detailed ridership behavior — origin and destination geography, transfer rates, mode of access, and demographic information — with built-in skip logic and validation.

Key Features

Data quality, by design

  • Built-in skip logic so respondents only see questions that apply to them.
  • Automatic validation of values against constraints and integrity rules at entry time.
  • Multi-language support by changing language settings on the device.
  • Geocoded origin and destination coordinates captured directly, eliminating the address-to-geocode loss.

Real-time program management

  • Real-time web dashboard streaming with map visualization.
  • Real-time QA/QC and analytics on incoming responses.
  • Real-time sampling-quota management by route, time of day, and segment.
  • Real-time progress reporting and shift management for the surveyor team.

Hiring approach

College students at $17/hour replaced consultant surveyors at $60/hour — over two-thirds less in labor cost — while providing bilingual coverage, local-area knowledge of the transit system, and a recurring talent pipeline for adjacent customer-service projects.

Results

  • ~30% cost savings vs. the paper-based survey overall.
  • 92% reduction in lead time from data collection to usable results.
  • 60–65% response rate with tablets, compared to under 20% with paper.
  • Near-zero throw-out rate — paper surveys typically lost ~20% of records due to un-geocodable addresses.
  • Eliminated ~$105K in printing, data entry, and geocoding costs for a ~30,000-survey cycle.
  • The program scaled: tablet surveys are now the default for every on-board survey at TriMet, and tablets are reused for facilities inventory, on-street customer service, and other field work.

Why It Matters For Small/Mid Transit Agencies

Most small and mid-sized agencies are still stuck with the paper-survey model — or paying a vendor a premium for a black-box tablet program. The TriMet program shows that the right combination of open-source tooling, in-house GIS, and tight program management can give an agency a survey instrument it owns, runs, and can adapt to the next study without starting from scratch. That same playbook — break the vendor lock-in, own the data, ship the dashboards — is what LMAi Labs brings to AI-powered service planning and Title VI equity analysis for transit agencies today.

Want similar results for your business?

Let's discuss how we can help you achieve your goals.

Start Your Project